Arc Mi Logo: The Arc Michigan - Achieve With Us!

Achieve With Us 

 

Find Your Local Chapter Contact Us About Us Site Map Search Tool Home

 

skip to main contentFor Children and Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

 

The Arc Michigan is a statewide chapter of The Arc of the United States

Friday Mail News  |  Developmental Disabilities  |  Public Policy & Action Alerts  |  Information & Resources  |  Chapters & Membership

family

 

The Arc Michigan

1325 S. Washington Ave.
Lansing, MI 48910-1652
Phone: (800) 292-7851

or (517) 487-5426
Fax: (517) 487-0303
Driving Directions

 

NEW!

2012 Tax Guide

 

2010 Annual Report

 

 

Arc Chapters

(pdf) (xls) (htm)

 

2011 Tax Guide

 

September 2010

Focus Newsletter

 

Donate Now through Network for Good

 

Share

 

Check calendar for other events

Public Policy

printer friendly version iconPrinter Friendly

  • Supports governmental advocacy at the local, state and national level

  • Dohn Hoyle, Executive Director for The Arc Michigan, is a registered lobbyist with the State of Michigan.

  • The Arc Michigan employs Wiener and Associates as a full service, bipartisan, governmental affairs law firm located in Lansing, Michigan.

Action Alerts (State and Federal)
Broker Fees should not be excluded from the MLR    TAKE ACTION!
We do not want Higher premiums, less access and no rebates for many consumers.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is currently considering a resolution calling for brokerage fees to be excluded from the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR). Consisting of the state insurance commissioners of all 50 states, NAIC frequently makes recommendations to Health and Human Services (HHS) on all MLR related matters.

The MLR, as mandated under the Affordable Care Act, requires that 80 cents out of every dollar in insurance premiums paid be put back into the healthcare of policyholders. If the full 80 percent is not put into patient care by the end of the year, the insurance companies are required, under the ACA, to send policyholders a rebate check (estimated to average $164).

Currently, 22 of the 50 state insurance commissioners have come out in favor of the resolution exempting insurance brokers from the MLR. If adopted, this will result in higher premiums, less access to healthcare and no rebates for many consumers.

Michigan’s own Commissioner, Kevin Clinton, is not among the 22 commissioners who have come out in support of the resolution, but will likely be targeted by the industry for support. It is important for healthcare consumers that the insurance and brokerage industry are not successful in winning Commissioner Clinton’s support, or the support of any additional NAIC commissioners.

We are asking our Coalition partners to fax NAIC President Susan Voss (816-783-8012) to express opposition to the resolution. (NAIC does not allow letters to be submitted electronically.) Please make sure your correspondence is cc’d to our own Commissioner Clinton (clintonk1@michigan.gov) and HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius (mlradjustments@hhs.gov )!

TAKE ACTION!                     
Act Now to Safeguard More Than $53 Million in Consumer Rebates!

Dear Michigan Consumers for Healthcare supporter,

Your immediate action is needed to assist the Michigan Consumers for Healthcare coalition in safeguarding more than $53 million that may be unjustly taken from state healthcare consumers and handed over to the commercial insurance carriers!

Known as the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR), insurance carriers are allowed to keep only 20 cents out of every dollar collected in premiums under the new Affordable Care Act (ACA). The remaining 80 cents must be reinvested annually into the healthcare of the policyholders. Insurance carriers that fail to spend the full 80 cents on patient care must then write reimbursement checks back to consumers for the difference. Expressing concern for the profitability of state commercial carriers, the Snyder Administration recently requested that the federal government provide the state a waiver allowing Michigan insurance carriers to keep 35 cents out of every dollar in 2012, 30 cents in 2113 and 25 cents in 2014.

What's at stake? If approved, this waiver request will inevitably lead to higher premiums in our state over the next three years and more uninsured citizens, thereby destabilizing the insurance market. It also means that consumers will be denied an estimated $25 million in
rebate checks in 2012, $18.4 million in 2013 and $10.7 million in 2014. The state has essentially decided that for-profit insurance companies like Aetna, Humana and Gold Rule Insurance need the $53 million more than consumers do!

Michigan Consumers for Healthcare is asking all of our partner organizations and consumer advocates to write Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and ask her to deny the waiver request submitted by Michigan Office of Insurance and Financial Regulation
Commissioner R. Kevin Clinton. A sample letter, talking points and link to the waiver application are attached to help you prepare your response.

To submit your own comment regarding the Michigan waiver application, you may write Secretary Sebellius at mlradjustments@hhs.org.  Please include Michigan in the email subject line.

We also need everyone to contact Senator's Stabenow and Levin's offices and ask them both to weigh in publicly against Michigan's waiver application. Senator Stabenow can be contacted at (202) 224-4822 or by e-mail. Senator Levin can be reached at (202)224-6221 or by e-mail

Action is needed immediately!

Sample Letter         Talking points       Waiver application

Don Hazaert
Project Director
Michigan Consumers for Healthcare
For more information please visit our website www.healthcareadvancement.org.

top

Action Alert! Michigan Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) Introduced - message from Michigan League for Human Services

Dear Members and Friends,

As we feared, legislation to end the Michigan Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) has been introduced. Sen. Roger Kahn, R-Saginaw Township, introduced Senate Bill 103 Tuesday.

The bill was cosponsored by Republican Senators Nofs (Battle Creek), Pavlov (St. Clair), Meekhof (West Olive), Jones (Grand Ledge), Brandenburg (Harrison Township), Booher (Evart).

The Michigan League for Human Services issued a statement on the day the bill was introduced.

The League has joined together with other groups in opposition to eliminating the ETIC and has launched a new website www.saveoureitc.com.

Please go to the website and contact your lawmakers about the EITC NOW! See the Take Action Now button.

Please share this website and urge others to contact their lawmakers. For more about the legislation and its impact on kids in Michigan, see our blog, Stand up for kids!

Gov. Rick Snyder will be introducing his first state budget next week. This is a critically important time for lawmakers to hear that balancing the budget on the backs of low-income families and kids is not the solution.

top

Doing Advocacy
Open For Questions Wrap Up

The trial run of Open for Questions has wrapped up with the President answering several of the most popular questions during a special online town hall. Click here to view the online town hall or read questions that have been submitted.

www.whitehouse.gov/OpenForQuestions/

top

State Issues/Updates

Supreme Court to Hear ACA Challenge, Health Exchange Bill Still Under Review

from MCMCH.org, November 15, 2011

 

Amid news that the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a challenge to the 2010 health care overhaul law--setting the stage for oral arguments by March and a decision in late June--House Health Policy Committee Chair Rep. Gail Haines said this week she has no members who are eager
to vote on a bill creating Michigan's health exchange. Last week the Senate passed SB 693 with split Republican support. (The bill passed on a 25-12 vote, with all 12 no votes coming from Republican senators. Attached, please find text of SB 693 as passed by the Senate, as well as the official floor summary analysis by the Senate Fiscal Agency.)


The measure creates a website called the MIHealth Marketplace that would act as a clearinghouse for insurance plans. The House committee has taken weeks of testimony on the concept of state health exchanges, which are mandated by the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and that "deliberative" process will continue with three more hearings when the Legislature comes back into session, Rep. Haines said.

"If handled properly, a health exchange could help consumers with choice, competition and value," she said. "We just want to make sure we are looking at all the available options."

Rep. Haines said the Supreme Court's announcement does influence the process of reviewing SB 693. While the committee will know more about what direction to take after the last hearing, Rep. Haines said the Republican caucus also must examine the health exchange issue.

Whether all those factors would postpone a vote this year, Rep. Haines said, "There are just so many uncertainties. I don't have any members clamoring to vote."

The bill calls for the marketplace to contract with the Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation to certify health benefit plans that could be obtained through the website.

 

On Tuesday the American Medical Association said that state insurance exchanges should not try to actively negotiate with health plans--called an 'active purchaser' model by consumer advocates--and instead allow any plan that meets the federal standards laid out in the
healthcare reform law to have access to the exchanges.

Divided Senate Passes Anti-Bullying Policy Requirement for Schools - November 2, 2011
from www.mcmch.org

The Senate divided along party lines over a bill that would require school districts to implement an anti-bullying policy.

Democrats argued passionately that specific characteristics, such as gender, race or sexual orientation, should be enumerated in SB 137 to better protect children from bullying. Republicans argued including those specifications would actually exclude some children from protection.

But the greatest divide between the parties arose over language included in a floor substitute to the bill that exempts any statement made based on a moral conviction or religious belief from being subject to the anti-bullying policy. Before the final party line 26-11 vote, there were several amendments debated by the body.

Reactions to the bill have been largely negative by those who have advocated for an anti-bullying measure. The bill is called "Matt's Safe School Law" named after Matt Epling, an East Lansing student who committed suicide after being bullied. Kevin Epling, Matt's father, has issued a statement saying he is "ashamed" of the bill because it does not address the reasons children are bullied and will not help prevent future incidents.

State Superintendent Mike Flanagan also weighed in. "There should never be an excuse or reason or justification for anyone to bully, intimidate, or harass a student. I cannot imagine any real moral conviction or religious teaching that says it acceptable to inflict pain, humiliation, and suffering on another person, especially a child," Mr. Flanagan said. "The legislation, as passed by the Michigan Senate, is a disappointing development in a process that we have worked on so diligently together for the protection of all schoolchildren in Michigan. After my long relationship with families of children who have committed suicide after being bullied, I find this bill now to be a joke, especially as it is named in memory of one of those children."

Wiener Associates Year End Legislative Summary
Federal Issues/Updates

Feds Rule District Can Limit School Choice For Special Education Students

From Disability Scoop

 

Department of Education officials are okaying a Missouri school district’s plan to require preschoolers with disabilities to attend a new special education center over objections from area parents.

Currently, Springfield, Mo. children with disabilities attend preschool within neighborhood schools where special education classes include typically developing children who often serve as role models. But when a new early childhood special education center is completed early next year, all special education preschoolers will be forced to move to the new facility.

A local parent filed a complaint with the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights arguing that unilaterally moving all special education students away from their zoned schools denies them their right to an education in the least restrictive environment. But this week the department found that the school district plan is perfectly legal, reports the (Springfield, Mo.) News-Leader. To read more click here.

top

Newsletters

top

Position Statements
Special Reports
2008 Arc Michigan Annual Report  (pdf) 

top

Disclaimer  |  Privacy Policy  |  Accessibility  |  Translate

© 2008-2012 The Arc Michigan.  All Rights Reserved.  Design: Jackie Igafo-Te'o